Comments for H.L. Mencken Information

Comment on Appendix 1: Arguments Mencken Did Not Use That Justify His Position — MC Part 16 by Greg Lindsay on “The vacuum of libertarian scholarship” « Economics.org.au

Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:23:26 +0000

[...] of far more importance currently, than the need for a libertarian political party. It was Hayek who said in 1949: Unless we can make the philosophic foundations of a free society once more a living intellectual [...]

Comment on Christian Science by hans tholstrup

hans tholstrup — Wed, 06 Jul 2011 06:56:33 +0000

Having grown up with parents who adopted me after they – allowed the death of their children – as no doctor was called, how I were allowed to have been adopted by such people, I dont know, the fact that they also had a rplacement doughter of their own, is not something we should interfeer in, but I would agree with some protection of children being adopted.

And I agree that Christian Science ( not that it is any Science ) should be allowed to ask a fee, as that might put them in to a responsbility bracket.

But as Government always interfeer never for the better, I dont see that change soon.

Comment on Conservatism and Libertarians — MC Part 15 by Mencken on Egyptian Politics and Queensland Floods « Economics.org.au

Mencken on Egyptian Politics and Queensland Floods « Economics.org.au — Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:00:24 +0000

[...] (For an elaboration of this passage and reference details, see here.) [...]

Comment on Appendix 2: A Menckenian Strategy for Libertarian Activism — MC Part 17 by Earn $$$$$ by Justifying Government Against Anarchocapitalism: Survey « Economics.org.au

Thu, 02 Dec 2010 06:04:01 +0000

[...] For each of the 8 questions please choose the option you most approve of. I have set it so that only one answer can be given for each question, forcing you to choose a favourite, but I realise that many of the options are not mutually exclusive. Feel free to add your own ideas in the comments section after the survey. (If you’re interested in previous discussions of this competition, see here and here.) [...]

Comment on Utopia by Sterilization by Ralph Prestage

Ralph Prestage — Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:43:52 +0000

Benjamin Marks comment ignores the simple fact that as each child is sterilised there can be no further issue which is the only way that civilisation can be sustained in an acceptable environment. Population growth will be maintained by those that can ignore the attraction of cash for sterilisation The objectors to population control exhibits an ignorance to preserve the remaining meager natural environment. The works of H.L. Mencken will be heralded as the greatest foresight of mankind but disappointed they were not implemented by future generations. The Chinese were intelligent enough to see the futility of unstrained population growth unfortunately condemned by the rest of the world to placate the inordinate media support of the loud uninformed minority.

Comment on Mencken’s Motives and Expectations — MC Part 3 by Tweets that mention Mencken’s Motives and Expectations — MC Part 3 | H.L. Mencken Information -- Topsy.com

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:37:32 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jack Shafer and Amy MacKinnon, Edward Wiest. Edward Wiest said: "I am never much interested in the effects of what I write." — H.L. Mencken http://bit.ly/9yrjcU (via @jackshafer) [sUIT YOURSELF!] [...]

Comment on Appendix 2: A Menckenian Strategy for Libertarian Activism — MC Part 17 by Feedback please: Is this worth doing? « Economics.org.au

Feedback please: Is this worth doing? « Economics.org.au — Thu, 16 Sep 2010 06:57:52 +0000

[...] said in the fuller explanation here, if the middle and right columns on Economics.org.au are good enough, no money need be given out, [...]

Comment on Utopia by Sterilization by Utopia by Sterilization | The American Mercury

Utopia by Sterilization | The American Mercury — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:49:30 +0000

[...] Original online article at H.L. Mencken Information [...]

Comment on Utopia by Sterilization by Utopia by Sterilization « National Vanguard

Utopia by Sterilization « National Vanguard — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 03:42:34 +0000

[...] online article at H.L. Mencken Information Classic Essays Eugenics, Genetics, H.L. Mencken, Sterilization [...]

Comment on Utopia by Sterilization by Benjamin Marks

Benjamin Marks — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:50:00 +0000

Surely, this proposal will still be an incentive on having more children, since each additional child a couple has, the more money they are eligible for to have the child sterilised.